Page 1 of 4
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 5:48 pm
by Way_Moby
OK, I heard that parodies fit under USA Fair Use laws, but I was wondering, does one need to pay the original artist if he records a parody. For instance, my band has been working on some parodies, and we really want to get them on iTunes and stuff, but I don't want to get sued for something illegal. What should I do, and more importantly, what is the legal thing to do?
Thanks
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 6:47 pm
by Big Spoon
It's perfectly legal to parody a song. Al just gets permission because wants to keep a friendly relationship with the original artists.
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 7:02 pm
by weird_el
I know Al gets permission and gives credit to the original artists, but I'm pretty sure he pays them a royalty as well.
I seem to recall when the Coolio bruhaha was happening Al said something like -- "I bet he liked his check."
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 7:35 pm
by Way_Moby
That's the thing, I realize its legal, but do I need to pay royalties as well?
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 7:42 pm
by Big Spoon
You don't have to, but it would be nice to do.
Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 11:45 pm
by U62
Big Spoon @ Jul 4 2008, 09:47 AM wrote:
It's perfectly legal to parody a song. Al just gets permission because wants to keep a friendly relationship with the original artists.
This is bad information. Al is protecting his ass[ets] just as much as he wants to keep things friendly.
A protected-by-law parody is something that makes fun of the source material. Just changing the lyrics to something funny doesn't qualify, and Al may not have been able to do most of his parodies without having permission from the artist or songwriter.
Although a parody can be considered a derivative work under United States Copyright Law, it can be protected from claims by the copyright owner of the original work under the fair use doctrine, which is codified in 17 USC ยง 107. The Supreme Court of the United States stated that parody
"is the use of some elements of a prior author's composition to create a new one that, at least in part, comments on that author's works." That commentary function provides some justification for use of the older work. See Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parody
There's a lot of gray area about what qualifies as protected parody and what is just a derivative work. Google is your friend.
U
Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 3:31 am
by Grom
Why was I subscribed to this topic when it was only created 10 hours ago, when I was in bed?
Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 4:32 am
by Big Spoon
Maybe your set to be automatically subscribed to every topic in General Chat?
Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 4:57 am
by The Doctor
Perhaps you're set to Forum Subscriptions, to be notified of new topics.
Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 5:10 am
by Grom
Weird, I never subscribed. Oh well, thanks guys.
On with the topic.