OK, I heard that parodies fit under USA Fair Use laws, but I was wondering, does one need to pay the original artist if he records a parody. For instance, my band has been working on some parodies, and we really want to get them on iTunes and stuff, but I don't want to get sued for something illegal. What should I do, and more importantly, what is the legal thing to do?
Thanks
Question About The Legality Of Parodies
Moderator: Moderators
- Way_Moby
- Obsessed
- Posts: 1414
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 9:19 pm
- Location: Kansas
- Contact:
- Big Spoon
- Welp.
- Posts: 28060
- Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 5:44 pm
- Awards: - Most Dedicated Non-Spoiler (2007)
- Best GC Thread (2010)
- Best TTR Skit (2010)
- Outstanding Achievement In Fan Parody (Recorded), Shared With The Rest Of The Minor Celebrities (2015) - Location: Pacific Palisades, CA
- Contact:
-
- Off The Deep End
- Posts: 6417
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2001 2:00 am
- Way_Moby
- Obsessed
- Posts: 1414
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 9:19 pm
- Location: Kansas
- Contact:
- Big Spoon
- Welp.
- Posts: 28060
- Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 5:44 pm
- Awards: - Most Dedicated Non-Spoiler (2007)
- Best GC Thread (2010)
- Best TTR Skit (2010)
- Outstanding Achievement In Fan Parody (Recorded), Shared With The Rest Of The Minor Celebrities (2015) - Location: Pacific Palisades, CA
- Contact:
-
- Die-hard Fan
- Posts: 492
- Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 1:53 pm
- Location: S.F. Bay
This is bad information. Al is protecting his ass[ets] just as much as he wants to keep things friendly.Big Spoon @ Jul 4 2008, 09:47 AM wrote: It's perfectly legal to parody a song. Al just gets permission because wants to keep a friendly relationship with the original artists.
A protected-by-law parody is something that makes fun of the source material. Just changing the lyrics to something funny doesn't qualify, and Al may not have been able to do most of his parodies without having permission from the artist or songwriter.
Although a parody can be considered a derivative work under United States Copyright Law, it can be protected from claims by the copyright owner of the original work under the fair use doctrine, which is codified in 17 USC § 107. The Supreme Court of the United States stated that parody "is the use of some elements of a prior author's composition to create a new one that, at least in part, comments on that author's works." That commentary function provides some justification for use of the older work. See Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parody
There's a lot of gray area about what qualifies as protected parody and what is just a derivative work. Google is your friend.
U
My name is U62 and I approved this message!
- Big Spoon
- Welp.
- Posts: 28060
- Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 5:44 pm
- Awards: - Most Dedicated Non-Spoiler (2007)
- Best GC Thread (2010)
- Best TTR Skit (2010)
- Outstanding Achievement In Fan Parody (Recorded), Shared With The Rest Of The Minor Celebrities (2015) - Location: Pacific Palisades, CA
- Contact:
- The Doctor
- Deliriously Dedicated
- Posts: 19609
- Joined: Fri Jan 17, 2003 3:08 am
- Location: TARDIS
- Contact: