Page 2 of 4
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 10:52 pm
by stupidsurgeon27
This is still really good news. Congrats to Al and Bill! Though, I agree that I like some of the other videos more than this one, but this one is more available to view on the internet.
Is it sad that when I saw the topic title for this thread, I thought of Driew's dog?
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 11:26 pm
by GrayJ
Wow, congrats Al and Bill!
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 11:34 pm
by crazygurl14
Congrats Bill and Al
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 1:28 am
by ducttapeearth
weird_el @ Dec 4 2006, 02:13 PM wrote:
A curious statement considering the Oscars DO have animation categories.
Well, the award for Best Feature Animated film is only a few years old.
I bet the reason it was this one is because it has a different art style and a bit more depth. The rest were a bit ... simplistic. It was artsy!
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 2:02 am
by Driew_La_27
stupidsurgeon27 @ Dec 4 2006, 12:52 PM wrote:
Is it sad that when I saw the topic title for this thread, I thought of Driew's dog?
Not at all.
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 3:07 am
by Grom
TMBJon @ Dec 5 2006, 07:25 AM wrote:
The animation style of DDTS is more innovative than the others. Some of the other ones are just flash animations or simple styles, whereas DDTS is more artistic.
Yeah, that makes sense. While I don't like the video, it's a pretty big achievement for Bill!
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 3:27 am
by Elvis
Congratulations Driew!!
Wait....
The sun'll come out tomorrow!
Okay, I'm done.
Dave
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 6:41 am
by Weird Alan
Why was Bill's video nominated while the others weren't? Is that even a serious question?
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 3:55 am
by Kevbo1987
Congrats to Bill and Al! While I don't care for the video, it has nothing to do with the animation style. I think the animation is very well done.
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 2:30 pm
by DemonScythe
That's totally Alsome!