Al At A Barenaked Ladies Show

Post by **algonacchick** » Fri Jun 20, 2008 5:52 am

Calm down. We already said we really can't see what she looks like. We were just trying to figure out which child she was in the picture. It's WAY too blurry, as I already stated.

Post by **Well, Well, Well** » Fri Jun 20, 2008 6:06 am

Um who cares

Fri Jun 20, 2008 7:08 am

Al & Suzanne have been careful about not having identifiable pictures of Nina published; it was OK to do a magazine & book photo spread on Bela the poodle, but they're not gonna let that happen with their daughter. But I really don't think Al minds a few well-behaved (we ARE well-behaved, aren't we?) fans seeing Nina, at least from a bit of distance-- if he did, Nina and Suzanne would never accompany him on tour. The whole point is not to bother her or scare her or make a fuss over her or approach her at all unless invited by one of her parents, or in any other way make it harder for her to have a normal childhood just because her daddy's famous. Squinting at blurry indistinguishable pictures from a flash video, or looking at pictures of Nina's hair or her Halloween costume or her feet on Suzanne's MySpace is just silly innocuous fan time-wasting. The Yankovics are cautious, not paranoid... so far as I know, we haven't yet given them reason to be.

Post by **kyky27** » Fri Jun 20, 2008 7:12 am

Well put. Very well put.

Post by **Well, Well, Well** » Fri Jun 20, 2008 7:15 am

Just seems like an invasion of privacy. this is a pic stolen from a myspace video = crazy. what if members were to actually get an actual pic of her?..then they'd think it was ok to post it here.

Post by **algonacchick** » Fri Jun 20, 2008 7:18 am

No, because we know better. Since this picture is not clear, and you can't see Nina, I don't see a problem with it. We already knew Al was at this show, we just figured out Suzanne and Nina were, too. It's pretty harmless.

Post by **kyky27** » Fri Jun 20, 2008 7:19 am

Well, if they weren't complete noobs they would know not to and to respect Al's privacy. They would know that Al wouldn't want pics of Nina here or anywhere! Well, they should know anyway.

Post by **Well, Well, Well** » Fri Jun 20, 2008 7:20 am

but this discussion encourages it it seems.

Post by **kyky27** » Fri Jun 20, 2008 7:23 am

Well now that we've posted what we just posted they will know not to.

DonnaNoble · Post by **DonnaNoble** » Fri Jun 20, 2008 7:23 am

There is a difference between a blurry pic of Nina (the only way we can even tell its them is Als infamous hairdo) and a clear picture of her face...

Quite a while ago, there was a rather clear picture of Nina posted here, and it was taken down if I remember correctly...