Page 29 of 31
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2009 10:43 pm
by TMBJon
I think that seems completely fair.
EDIT: Please don't stalk the Yankovics, despite Senators McCain and Feingold making it possible to do...
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 12:28 am
by RyanHippFTW
TMBJon @ October 08, 2009 04:43 pm wrote:
EDIT: Please don't stalk the Yankovics, despite Senators McCain and Feingold making it possible to do...
If that refers to my TiVo comment, Suzanne tweeted about it.
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 12:29 am
by TMBJon
It does not.
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 12:31 am
by RyanHippFTW
Goody.

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 12:31 am
by TMBJon
I would say, however, that if Suzanne tweets about something, it's fair game for discussion on this forum.
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 12:33 am
by RyanHippFTW
and now, a Green & Black's organic bittersweet dark chocolate bar, some hot green tea and last night's @maddow on tivo.
So, can we talk about how great Rachel is without getting politics involved?
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 12:41 am
by TMBJon
GuyWhoIsAnonymous @ October 08, 2009 03:33 pm wrote:
So, can we talk about how great Rachel is without getting politics involved?
No.
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 12:45 am
by RyanHippFTW
Crap.

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 1:46 am
by scottidog
TMBJon @ October 08, 2009 03:31 pm wrote:
I would say, however, that if Suzanne tweets about something, it's fair game for discussion on this forum.
I would say that is true. Except that politics and religion are not appropriate subjects. As we've seen, they tend to cause arguments and hurt feelings.
So, does anyone know if Suzanne's still doing glass blowing?
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 1:49 am
by Big Spoon
I'd guess so.