The Big Suzanne Topic

Post by **TMBJon** » Thu Oct 08, 2009 10:43 pm

I think that seems completely fair.

EDIT: Please don't stalk the Yankovics, despite Senators McCain and Feingold making it possible to do...

Post by **RyanHippFTW** » Fri Oct 09, 2009 12:28 am

TMBJon @ October 08, 2009 04:43 pm wrote: EDIT: Please don't stalk the Yankovics, despite Senators McCain and Feingold making it possible to do...

If that refers to my TiVo comment, Suzanne tweeted about it.

Post by **TMBJon** » Fri Oct 09, 2009 12:29 am

It does not.

Post by **RyanHippFTW** » Fri Oct 09, 2009 12:31 am

Goody.

Post by **TMBJon** » Fri Oct 09, 2009 12:31 am

I would say, however, that if Suzanne tweets about something, it's fair game for discussion on this forum.

Post by **RyanHippFTW** » Fri Oct 09, 2009 12:33 am

and now, a Green & Black's organic bittersweet dark chocolate bar, some hot green tea and last night's @maddow on tivo.

So, can we talk about how great Rachel is without getting politics involved?

Post by **TMBJon** » Fri Oct 09, 2009 12:41 am

GuyWhoIsAnonymous @ October 08, 2009 03:33 pm wrote:
So, can we talk about how great Rachel is without getting politics involved?

No.

Post by **RyanHippFTW** » Fri Oct 09, 2009 12:45 am

Crap.

Post by **scottidog** » Fri Oct 09, 2009 1:46 am

TMBJon @ October 08, 2009 03:31 pm wrote: I would say, however, that if Suzanne tweets about something, it's fair game for discussion on this forum.

I would say that is true. Except that politics and religion are not appropriate subjects. As we've seen, they tend to cause arguments and hurt feelings.

So, does anyone know if Suzanne's still doing glass blowing?

Post by **Big Spoon** » Fri Oct 09, 2009 1:49 am

I'd guess so.