Page 15 of 54
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2004 7:20 pm
by squishsquashgirl
whoah. cool. :wow:
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2004 12:33 am
by sarley27
I was thinking today. If Emo and Raul were cut, it would've gotten a PG. So does this mean Town Talk is rated PG? I ALWAYS skip over that when I'm watching with little kids. I can picture it now:
"Mommy, what's a lesbian nazi hooker?"
:shudders:
any thoughts?
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2004 12:42 am
by weirdojace
Heh. I guess so. PG movies have allowed stuff like that before...
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2004 12:44 am
by sarley27
But c'mon!
There are a few odd ball PGs though, like Spaceballs (which has the F bomb in it)
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2004 12:47 am
by weirdojace
The MPAA is very weird. They give movies ratings they don't deserve.
Yes, Spaceballs should have been a PG-13. The MPAA probably only made it PG because it was a parody of something kids like. Also, look at "Ice Age." That did not deserve PG. More like...G!
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2004 12:52 am
by Driew_La_27
weirdojace @ Feb 15 2004, 02:47 PM wrote:
The MPAA is very weird. They give movies ratings they don't deserve.
Yes, Spaceballs should have been a PG-13. The MPAA probably only made it PG because it was a parody of something kids like. Also, look at "Ice Age." That did not deserve PG. More like...G!
Actually back when Spaceballs was made, 1987, the MPAA are not as strict about their rating system. Like I saw a PG movie, made in the 80s, that had sexual content in it along with nudity
..........ahem was well anyways. Just thought I'd mention that. :lookround: Gotta love the eighties.
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2004 12:53 am
by sarley27
Well, different people rate it every time.
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2004 12:57 am
by Driew_La_27
I know, but their scoring guide for rating the movie wasn't as strict. Like now if it says b*tch its PG-13. If it says crap it goes from a G movie to a PG movie.
But back in the 80s and such they would have to have sex selling drugs and cussing everyother word in order to make it a PG-13 movie. But in 2004 if that was in a new movie that would be a R movie.
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2004 1:19 am
by ccsyaoran
people could argue the opposite... 'specaily in canada...
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2004 1:21 am
by Driew_La_27
ccsyaoran @ Feb 15 2004, 03:19 PM wrote:
people could argue the opposite... 'specaily in canada...
:eh:
What's to argue about?