The Big Fat UHF Topic

squishsquashgirl · Post by **squishsquashgirl** » Fri Jan 23, 2004 7:20 pm

whoah. cool. :wow:

sarley27 · Post by **sarley27** » Mon Feb 16, 2004 12:33 am

I was thinking today. If Emo and Raul were cut, it would've gotten a PG. So does this mean Town Talk is rated PG? I ALWAYS skip over that when I'm watching with little kids. I can picture it now:
"Mommy, what's a lesbian nazi hooker?"

:shudders:

any thoughts?

Post by **weirdojace** » Mon Feb 16, 2004 12:42 am

Heh. I guess so. PG movies have allowed stuff like that before...

sarley27 · Post by **sarley27** » Mon Feb 16, 2004 12:44 am

But c'mon!

There are a few odd ball PGs though, like Spaceballs (which has the F bomb in it)

Post by **weirdojace** » Mon Feb 16, 2004 12:47 am

The MPAA is very weird. They give movies ratings they don't deserve.

Yes, Spaceballs should have been a PG-13. The MPAA probably only made it PG because it was a parody of something kids like. Also, look at "Ice Age." That did not deserve PG. More like...G!

Post by **Driew_La_27** » Mon Feb 16, 2004 12:52 am

weirdojace @ Feb 15 2004, 02:47 PM wrote: The MPAA is very weird. They give movies ratings they don't deserve.

Yes, Spaceballs should have been a PG-13. The MPAA probably only made it PG because it was a parody of something kids like. Also, look at "Ice Age." That did not deserve PG. More like...G!

Actually back when Spaceballs was made, 1987, the MPAA are not as strict about their rating system. Like I saw a PG movie, made in the 80s, that had sexual content in it along with nudity

..........ahem was well anyways. Just thought I'd mention that. :lookround: Gotta love the eighties.

sarley27 · Post by **sarley27** » Mon Feb 16, 2004 12:53 am

Well, different people rate it every time.

Post by **Driew_La_27** » Mon Feb 16, 2004 12:57 am

I know, but their scoring guide for rating the movie wasn't as strict. Like now if it says b*tch its PG-13. If it says crap it goes from a G movie to a PG movie.

But back in the 80s and such they would have to have sex selling drugs and cussing everyother word in order to make it a PG-13 movie. But in 2004 if that was in a new movie that would be a R movie.

Post by **ccsyaoran** » Mon Feb 16, 2004 1:19 am

people could argue the opposite... 'specaily in canada...

Post by **Driew_La_27** » Mon Feb 16, 2004 1:21 am

ccsyaoran @ Feb 15 2004, 03:19 PM wrote: people could argue the opposite... 'specaily in canada...

:eh:

What's to argue about?