Word Crimes

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
mrmeadows
Obsessed
Posts: 1591
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2002 10:18 am
Location: Burbank, CA

Re: Word Crimes

Post by mrmeadows »

Someone already guessed that Al would note the serial misuse of "literally" as a Word Crime. What other crimes against English will he likely point out? I'm hoping he touches on "ironically", as that one gets misused almost as frequently as "literally". (See: Morrisette, Alanis). He might do the "fewer" vs. "less" rule, just based on that Vine he posted some time ago.

Also, for the video, there's the (slimy) bit towards the end of the Blurred Lines video where they spell out "Robin Thicke Has a Big D" in balloons. I bet Al does something in his video reminding us of a capitalization rule for a common word that often wrongly gets spelled without a capital letter. I'm blanking on what that example could be, but something like " '[The Word]' Has a Big ___".

(Or maybe even funnier, the reverse rule using a word that people wrongly capitalize that doesn't need to be capitalized. (" '[The Word]' Does NOT Have a Big ____!")
User avatar
Bruce the Duck
Deliriously Dedicated
Posts: 25029
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 3:49 am
Location: Here

Re: Word Crimes

Post by Bruce the Duck »

mrmeadows wrote: Also, for the video, there's the (slimy) bit towards the end of the Blurred Lines video where they spell out "Robin Thicke Has a Big D" in balloons. I bet Al does something in his video reminding us of a capitalization rule for a common word that often wrongly gets spelled without a capital letter. I'm blanking on what that example could be, but something like " '[The Word]' Has a Big ___".
:lol: That's perfect! Hmm. My first thought when I read that is "What words do people tend to forget to capitalize? From my experience, I see the words "mom" and "dad" done incorrectly. When they're used as a name, they're capitalized, but otherwise not. That would be great if the wall said, "Dad has a big D" or "Your dad has a small D". :lol: I don't think he'd be that edgy, but it'd be hilarious!

As for the types of errors, I was wondering about that. Will it be more grammatical errors (adverbs vs adjectives, less vs fewer, etc) or word meaning errors (literally, ironic) or a combination of both? I'm hoping for both.
Marko_The_Odd
Die-hard Fan
Posts: 464
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2003 12:02 am
Location: The Middle of Nowhere, Canada

Re: Word Crimes

Post by Marko_The_Odd »

I'm curious if he'll do something interesting with the "What rhymes with Hug Me?" part, though he did touch upon it on Twitter.
User avatar
Bruce the Duck
Deliriously Dedicated
Posts: 25029
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 3:49 am
Location: Here

Re: Word Crimes

Post by Bruce the Duck »

Marko_The_Odd wrote:I'm curious if he'll do something interesting with the "What rhymes with Hug Me?" part, though he did touch upon it on Twitter.
Link please? I missed that.
User avatar
Big Spoon
Welp.
Posts: 28060
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 5:44 pm
Awards: - Most Dedicated Non-Spoiler (2007)
- Best GC Thread (2010)
- Best TTR Skit (2010)
- Outstanding Achievement In Fan Parody (Recorded), Shared With The Rest Of The Minor Celebrities (2015)
Location: Pacific Palisades, CA
Contact:

Re: Word Crimes

Post by Big Spoon »

And Peggy
User avatar
mrmeadows
Obsessed
Posts: 1591
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2002 10:18 am
Location: Burbank, CA

Re: Word Crimes

Post by mrmeadows »

Bruce the Duck wrote:
mrmeadows wrote:That would be great if the wall said, "Dad has a big D" or "Your dad has a small D".
That's actually very funny (on a couple of levels)! Probably would work best if he showed BOTH of the above in subsequent shots, to help illustrate the distinction. (And get an extra double-entendre laugh!) :lol:
Last edited by mrmeadows on Tue Jul 01, 2014 6:49 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
mrmeadows
Obsessed
Posts: 1591
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2002 10:18 am
Location: Burbank, CA

Re: Word Crimes

Post by mrmeadows »

Marko_The_Odd wrote:I'm curious if he'll do something interesting with the "What rhymes with Hug Me?" part, though he did touch upon it on Twitter.
He almost has to, as that's one of the more infamous (and stupid) parts of that song. Got me as to what he'll do with it, though.
User avatar
CharlesNelson
Regular
Posts: 319
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2011 12:40 am
Awards: All of them
Location: Joisey

Re: Word Crimes

Post by CharlesNelson »

I hope he does "less vs. fewer" too, per his short grammar videos from a while ago, though that and some of these other grammar rules brought up here might take some time to explain well.

As I listened to the original, one line that caught my ear for a change was "It always works for me" toward the end. I think he could keep this line in there if he uses something like a memory tool - I before E is a bad example, but imagine him singing something like "remember ___ / It always works for me-ee..."

Also, for the longest time I though Thicke saying "It's in yo nature" was "Insinuate ya" :lol: So that particular word would be nice to hear in Word Crimes, however it works into the theme.

What can he do for the "Everybody get up!" said throughout the song by I think Pharrell?

(Edited for grammar because I don't want to be the one with poor grammar in the Word Crimes thread.)
Welcome to the World of Matt Walsh, the biggest forum about Matt Walsh! Enjoy your stay with us!
User avatar
Bruce the Duck
Deliriously Dedicated
Posts: 25029
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 3:49 am
Location: Here

Re: Word Crimes

Post by Bruce the Duck »

CharlesNelson wrote:I hope he does "less vs. fewer" too, per his short grammar videos from a while ago, though that and some of these other grammar rules brought up here might take some time to explain well.
I don't think he'd have to explain the grammar rules, but rather just point them out. It worked well enough the way he did it in CBNC.

I was thinking I wonder if he'll touch on common mispronunciations as well, such as "different" or "nuclear".
User avatar
TMBJon
Deliriously Dedicated
Posts: 20491
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2003 4:24 pm
Awards: Greatest Member of All Time
Location: Santa Monica, CA

Re: Handy

Post by TMBJon »

Bruce the Duck wrote:with "Blurred Lines" right behind
As catchy as it is, it's hard to say Blurred Lines is a good song given its decidedly pro-rape message. To be clear, this is different from the usual debate we've had about whether a song can be objectively bad. Setting that aside, since the song explicitly advocates raping women, I can't say I'm a fan. :*
I couldn't tell a dirt clod from a plate of caviar.
Post Reply