Al was probably less enthused about the song. It's usually not like him to detract from a song, but maybe he figured fans wouldn't really care one way or another.
Only Al knows for sure.
Moderator: Moderators
1) Lyrically and comedy-wise, it's just not as clever, funny, or imaginative as most of his stuff.
2) Musically, it sounded more like something that would have been on his debut album, with the musical hands and so on.
3) Vocally, not only did he not attempt to duplicate Lauper's singing (which, granted, is very unique and difficult to imitate), but he sang in that really obnoxious, annoying voice.
So here's my question: Did Al intentionally make the song so weak as a way of sticking it to the record company? Was the song done poorly out of spite? What do you guys think?
scottidog @ Jan 11 2004, 04:05 PM wrote: I'm not sure that I agree with your premise.1) Lyrically and comedy-wise, it's just not as clever, funny, or imaginative as most of his stuff.
Al has his hits and misses. I actually think some of the stuff in this song is very funny. She eats like she's got a hole in her neck? Come on, that's funny!
anthontherun @ Jan 11 2004, 05:28 PM wrote: I think that even if Al didn't want to do a song, he would still give 110% for the fans.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest