Page 3 of 3

Re: Overall Review of Al's Catalog

Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 6:39 pm
by YankoSwag 8888
Yankomaniac wrote:Pretty clear it is just a number he slapped on each one based on his own opinion of that track. Schwag, you got WAY too much time on your hands.
Obviously I based it on my own opinion.

Re: Overall Review of Al's Catalog

Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2016 2:52 am
by TMBJon
Incidentally, I did the math on your overall rating and it checks out. Your actual rating was about 8.7 out of 10, but that rounds up to 9.

Re: Overall Review of Al's Catalog

Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2016 2:54 am
by TMBJon
Okay, update: I see now that you've changed the overall rating to 10 out of 10.
I have to call into question your methodology here. How could it possibly be that the average of all of those ratings equals 9.5 or above given how many sub-8 ratings you gave out? Something doesn't add up here, maybe you could do the math and try again.

Re: Overall Review of Al's Catalog

Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2016 2:57 am
by YankoSwag 8888
Added all the scores up 10/10=1???/1000

Re: Overall Review of Al's Catalog

Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2016 3:32 am
by Muppetboy09
YankoSwag 8888 wrote:Added all the scores up 10/10=1???/1000
What you should do is add up the score, as in 8+9+9 (8/10, 9/10, 9/10), multiply the number of tens by the number of track listings, and then divide your first number by the correct amount of tens, and you should get your overall score in decimal form. Obviously, they wouldn't amount to a 10/10, as the only way that would be possible is if every single track was scored 10/10.