Obviously I based it on my own opinion.Yankomaniac wrote:Pretty clear it is just a number he slapped on each one based on his own opinion of that track. Schwag, you got WAY too much time on your hands.
Overall Review of Al's Catalog
Moderator: Moderators
- YankoSwag 8888
- Obsessed
- Posts: 1195
- Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2016 4:56 pm
- Awards: All of them
- Location: Victoria BC
- Contact:
Re: Overall Review of Al's Catalog
- TMBJon
- Deliriously Dedicated
- Posts: 20491
- Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2003 4:24 pm
- Awards: Greatest Member of All Time
- Location: Santa Monica, CA
Re: Overall Review of Al's Catalog
Incidentally, I did the math on your overall rating and it checks out. Your actual rating was about 8.7 out of 10, but that rounds up to 9.
I couldn't tell a dirt clod from a plate of caviar.
- TMBJon
- Deliriously Dedicated
- Posts: 20491
- Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2003 4:24 pm
- Awards: Greatest Member of All Time
- Location: Santa Monica, CA
Re: Overall Review of Al's Catalog
Okay, update: I see now that you've changed the overall rating to 10 out of 10.
I have to call into question your methodology here. How could it possibly be that the average of all of those ratings equals 9.5 or above given how many sub-8 ratings you gave out? Something doesn't add up here, maybe you could do the math and try again.
I have to call into question your methodology here. How could it possibly be that the average of all of those ratings equals 9.5 or above given how many sub-8 ratings you gave out? Something doesn't add up here, maybe you could do the math and try again.
I couldn't tell a dirt clod from a plate of caviar.
- YankoSwag 8888
- Obsessed
- Posts: 1195
- Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2016 4:56 pm
- Awards: All of them
- Location: Victoria BC
- Contact:
Re: Overall Review of Al's Catalog
Added all the scores up 10/10=1???/1000
- Muppetboy09
- Obsessed
- Posts: 1713
- Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 9:32 pm
- Awards: Best Emoticon (Animated)
Best Emoticon (Non Animated)
Best New Member (2010-2013) - Contact:
Re: Overall Review of Al's Catalog
What you should do is add up the score, as in 8+9+9 (8/10, 9/10, 9/10), multiply the number of tens by the number of track listings, and then divide your first number by the correct amount of tens, and you should get your overall score in decimal form. Obviously, they wouldn't amount to a 10/10, as the only way that would be possible is if every single track was scored 10/10.YankoSwag 8888 wrote:Added all the scores up 10/10=1???/1000
"Be the climate, not the weather." -Al Yankovic